Jonathan Nieder dixit: > pcc (Portable C compiler): unfixed - http://bugs.debian.org/638309
Yes, but that was not the main showstopper for pcc. Besides upstream bugs on some architectures (recently, even Linux/amd64 broke again – I’m following pcc dev), the main problem was how to get pcc-libs for the target architecture installed. Since I can now finally use "Depends: pcc-libs:i386" on arch-any packages (which was not at first allowed by M-A but got added to dpkg recently), I believe I can go forward some day now and put together new pcc versions for experi- mental that actually make use of M-A. I approximately know how to deal with the pathnames (having worked enough with gcc), so no need to assist at the moment (though, that being said, pcc is lower priority to me than others at the moment – contact me if it’s important to you). bye, //mirabilos -- Sometimes they [people] care too much: pretty printers [and syntax highligh- ting, d.A.] mechanically produce pretty output that accentuates irrelevant detail in the program, which is as sensible as putting all the prepositions in English text in bold font. -- Rob Pike in "Notes on Programming in C" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1208021236200.4...@herc.mirbsd.org
