Hi Lars, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 04:38:21PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > >On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 08:07:15PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > >> Thank you, but I would appreciate if debian-devel-announce would > >> stay dedicated to important announcements which may be useful for a > >> wide range of developers. > > > >tech-ctte resolutions do fit that bill. The tech-ctte is the highest > >dispute resolution body we have in Debian, and I think their doings > >deserve this level of awareness in the project. > > although publicity of some resolutions may indeed be useful for a > wide range of developers, I fail to see many who would be interested > in the resolution on node. You're complaining about the posting volume of a list that has 13 + 17 + 16 + 7 + 8 + 10 + 4 = 75 messages this year, or about 2.6 days between posts.
No, I simply explained it would have been better to send the message in question elsewhere, avoiding debian-devel-announce. It may be that there are few messages in this situation, and that more messages were in the opposite situation and should have been sent to debian-devel-announce.
[...] In my opinion, _every_ technical committee decision should be posted to debian-devel-announce. Any time that the TC needs to make a decision, it's already an unusual circumstance, and usually something's gone wrong.
Conflicts are intrinsic in projects divided into thousands of inter-dependent sub-projects with private decision-making processes... I would be more worried to see no conflicts in our system.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/500c919e.5000...@gmail.com
