On 07/06/2012 07:10 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > ]] Jakub Wilk > >> I wrote a tool to detect versioned (build-)dependencies with possible >> missing (or insufficient) epochs. The results for unstable and a >> DD-list are attached. > > Thanks, this looks like a useful tool. > > results for chef and varnish, while not wrong, are harmless, since > there's no version too old in the archive to satisfy the requirement, > even without a version.
I have a couple of these too and wonder what's the best "fix" is? Bump to the correct epoch'ed version or drop it completely? As there is no too old version in the archive (>= stable), there would be no harm droping the version, right? Regards Evgeni -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ff93d05.6040...@debian.org
