On Mon, 11 Jun 2012, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 06/11/2012 12:06 AM, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > swap file on / [...] is
> > really the direction that we should be going
> NO !
Some imprecise language on my part has apparently lead to some
misunderstanding of what I am suggesting.
I don't mean a swap file that gets used as swap. I meant file(s) which
are on / (or some other large filesystem if / is not large) which are
used to handle /tmp growing beyond the bounds of the memory assigned
to it. These file(s) should be orthogonal to the current memory
management system. [I know that using a swap file can currently do
this to some extent, but it has other problems.]
Don Armstrong
--
Maybe I did steal your heart
and I am such a perfect criminal
that you never noticed
-- a softer world #481
http://www.asofterworld.com/index.php?id=481
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120611171326.gp32...@rzlab.ucr.edu
