> > Why do you think we are still discussing "non-maintainer" uploads?
>
> I don't know ;-) that's why I got into the discussion.
The discussion started when someone (I forgot who :) did a non-maintainer
upload for another architecture _twice_, the second time with different
depedencies (resulted from simply recompiling) but with the same version
number.
However, the `non-maintainer' part of this discussion is totally
unimportant. What matters is the question `in which cases has the version
number to be incremented and in which cases can it be left'?
I think we all agree now that the version number has to be incremented
whenever the binary package is changed on master (even in Incoming/).
(The only situation where one can upload a binary package twice without
changing the version number would be when the first upload wasn't
successful--i.e., the fules got truncated.)
Thanks,
Chris
-- Christian Schwarz
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
CS Software goes online! Visit our new home page at
http://www.schwarz-online.com
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
