On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 01:06:54PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
|| Guillem Jover writes ("Re: on the use of chmod/chown in maintainer
scripts"):
|| > On Sat, 2012-05-12 at 22:47:22 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
|| > > I can't see an equivalent in GNU tar. But BSD tar is available
|| > > in Debian.
|| >
|| > This would imply BSD tar needs to be promoted to the Essential set
|| > alongside GNU tar, at which point I might as well just use an
|| > internal tar implementation.
||
|| ??? Are we talking about unpack ? Because dpkg's unpack code already
|| has an internal tar implementation. This is necessary to get all the
|| file write / rename / conffile / etc. functionality to work properly.No, this is about packing. Doing packing with dpkg-deb invoking bsdtar would either make bsdtar essential, or require that dpkg-deb switch to use whatever tar is available. Privately, I've succeeded in bypassing dpkg-deb entirely for packing, using bsdtar for creating tar-archives as well as ar-archives (for the .deb format). And no more need for a staging directory or for root privileges to ensure proper ownership for files in the tar-archive. Ciao. Vincent. -- Vincent Zweije <vinc...@zweije.nl> | "If you're flamed in a group you <http://www.xs4all.nl/~zweije/> | don't read, does anybody get burnt?" [Xhost should be taken out and shot] | -- Paul Tomblin on a.s.r.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
