This is an apology for not having packaged a new release of gpc yet. I was planning to work on it during our final exam period, which is always a quiet time for me, then our new head of faculty decided he wanted the student grades anaylsed and reported in 20,000 different ways (well not actually that many, but a lot). So instead of being able to work on gpc, have been up to my neck modifying some very old Cobol programs (I didn't know anyting about Cobol 2 weeks ago), sql programming and so gpc has been neglected. Things should slow down next week when we start the inter-semester break, so hopefully I will have something finished by the end of January. Apologises to anyone waiting,
Richard At 09:40 PM 1/3/98 +0200, Kai Henningsen wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Davies) wrote on 07.12.97 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> This is a request for some feedback from current and potential users of GPC. >> I have GPC 2.0 compiled for hamm, built using GCC 2.7.2.3. The next >> version of GPC (currently 971001) is in beta, but is already more stable >> than GPC 2.0. There seems to be a few possibilities available. I could >> package GPC 2.0, GPC 971001 beta, both versions, or wait until GPC 971001 >> beta is released as GPC 2.1. Let me know your preferences, if any, within >> the next few of days and I will then decide which course of action to take. > >The archive has 2.0-3 in both bo and project/orphaned (well, the latter is >source-only), from 1996, from Christoph Lameter. > >And WNPP claims that Christoph orphaned them, and Paul J. Thompson took >it. > >Is anybody working on it? > >MfG Kai > > >-- >TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to >[EMAIL PROTECTED] . >Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . > > > -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
