On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 20:30 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > OoO En ce doux début de matinée du lundi 30 avril 2012, vers 08:15, > Svante Signell <svante.sign...@telia.com> disait : > > >> I'm rather sure that he wants to define booting as part of what > >> currently is done in /etc/rcS.d. Configuring the network or mounting > >> non-essential remote file systems wouldn't be part of this definition. > >> > >> Then he would state that these early tasks do not need events at all, > >> and conclude that later tasks can be handled in event based userspace > >> tools, but that the initial process that invokes these event based tools > >> doesn't require events and thus can stay simple. > > > Nice summary, thanks. This is the whole idea behind defining boot... > > Some people get it, others don't. > > Since your boot definition is mostly the current initrd, you seem to > agree that the current init system could be replaced with something more > current like upstart and systemd.
On the contrary, with this definition init scripts are sufficient, and the event-based stuff happens later, e.g. with event based user space tools, udev<->linux kernel. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1335904618.3707.192.ca...@hp.my.own.domain
