Ansgar Burchardt <ans...@debian.org> writes:

> The ones I saw just asked to drop "+ssh" from Vcs-* fields which I
> imagine a new lintian check could also achieve.

Merely dropping the “+ssh” is unlikely to result in a working URL, at
least for many such repositories. Often, the publicly-accessible URL is
quite different from the SSH-accessible URL.

This is because the public-accessible URL is made available relative to
the root of a (usually) web service; whereas the SSH-accessible URL is
relative to the filesystem root directory, or the home directory of
whoever logs in. Switching from one to the other needs to consider this
difference.

So I would suggest that the reports you file should not talk
particularly about “+ssh”; they should instead point out that the URLs
are not currently accessible by the public, and request that the
public-accessible repository URL be specified.

-- 
 \       “The Vatican is not a state.… a state must have people. There |
  `\    are no Vaticanians.… No-one gets born in the Vatican except by |
_o__)        an unfortunate accident.” —Geoffrey Robertson, 2010-09-18 |
Ben Finney


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87vckobrlm....@benfinney.id.au

Reply via email to