Steve Langasek wrote: > The current state of upstart in Debian is a reflection of the upstart > maintainers' respect for Debian and desire to not destabilize the > distribution by triggering an avalanche of package conversions that could > quickly take us past the point of no return for bit rot of our init scripts.
While systemd has been introduced without such destabilization... > Whereas there's no indication that RHEL is switching away from upstart. Really? Fedora switching to systemd and Red Had employees adding systemd-dependent features to other projects doesn't indicate anything whatsoever? IMO your upstart advocacy and anti-systemd FUD crosses the line between having your own opinions and having your own facts. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1332527357.25977.89.camel@glyph.nonexistent.invalid
