Lars Wirzenius <l...@liw.fi> writes: > I don't know what should happen next, except someone should take > leadership on this issue and find a rough consensus on what we as a > project want to do. The usual way of that to happen is for someone to > grab a keyboard and start writing actual code, as opposed to > e-mails. Do-ocracy ftw.
I believe we should finalize the Policy update to allow packages to start including optional upstart scripts (#591791, which needs more seconds), write a similar Policy update for systemd, and then get some practical experience. That doesn't resolve the whole problem, but it does let people start doing things instead of just talking about it and may uncover interesting data. And allowing packages to include parallel upstart configuration with init scripts that defer to upstart when it's available has the separate advantage of immediately making life easier for packagers who want to maintain the same package on both Debian and Ubuntu. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87haxocrma....@windlord.stanford.edu
