On Tue, 6 Mar 2012 08:07:37 +0100, Wouter Verhelst <wou...@debian.org> wrote: ... > So far, I haven't seen any features in systemd that outweigh those. And > the fact that upstream is lazy and doesn't want to do this portability > thing shouldn't mean we should throw out our other ports.
I know it's already been mentioned in this thread, but perhaps it bears repeating, that we use openssh, where the upstream effectively has the same attitude when it comes to portability code in their own source tree. Despite that they happily work with the porting team to generate the version that everyone uses on Linux. Is a similar approach not possible for systemd? Cheers, Phil. -- |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] http://www.hands.com/ |-| HANDS.COM Ltd. http://www.uk.debian.org/ |(| 10 Onslow Gardens, South Woodford, London E18 1NE ENGLAND
pgpmsa4prPOI4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
