Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> writes: > Afaics both upstream projects take more or less the same position on > that matter.
> At least Scott [1] was clear that he didn't intend to merge any > non-Linux specific code and that a kfreebsd port would basically have to > be maintained as a fork/branch. My recollection of the last round of discussion is that this is old information and Scott's more recent stance is not as discouraging of support for kFreeBSD as I understand it. At the least, Scott's position has always been more one of practicalities and details rather than the active hostility of systemd. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/874nujokp1....@windlord.stanford.edu
