Jakub Wilk <[email protected]> writes: > I normally advocate using upstream name for source package name (even if > it's a single binary package and the binary package would have a > different name due to $LANGUAGE policy).
This can make things unnecessarily awkward and confusing for, say, the BTS. Nothing that people can't deal with, but in the Perl group we had a discussion about this a while back and decided to always stick with calling the source package and the binary package the same thing if the source only builds one binary. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
