Jakub Wilk <jw...@debian.org> writes:

> I normally advocate using upstream name for source package name (even if
> it's a single binary package and the binary package would have a
> different name due to $LANGUAGE policy).

This can make things unnecessarily awkward and confusing for, say, the
BTS.  Nothing that people can't deal with, but in the Perl group we had a
discussion about this a while back and decided to always stick with
calling the source package and the binary package the same thing if the
source only builds one binary.

-- 
Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ehuqf4nx....@windlord.stanford.edu

Reply via email to