On 20.01.2012 14:21, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 01:19:00PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> The "problem" is that kernel does not know what /dev/mapper >> is, or what does /dev/r/usr thing mean. It knows these by >> their canonical (and meaningless) dm-N names, like this: >> >> [ 6.887981] EXT4-fs (dm-0): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. >> Opts: (null) >> [ 6.917555] EXT4-fs (dm-1): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. >> Opts: usrquota >> >> Go figure which is dm-0 and which is dm-1 (lvm is here)! >> >> My point is that actually, _both_ /dev/mapper/r-usr and >> /dev/r/usr are wrong! But at least they - hopefully - >> lead to the actual device, unlike kernel messages I >> mentioned above which leads to nothing due to /dev/dm-0 >> non-existing. > > At least on my system (udev), they certainly do exist, for example: > > % ls -l /dev/mapper/ravenclaw-root > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Jan 20 09:01 /dev/mapper/ravenclaw-root -> ../dm-0
Aha. I was looking at squeeze version where they didnt. So Goswin, instead of getting a more preferred for him /dev/r/usr, will get /dev/dm-1 ;) Thanks, /mjt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f198d39.3060...@msgid.tls.msk.ru
