Le mercredi 18 janvier 2012 à 19:13 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit : > I'm not sure I see the point. DEP was never meant to be a device that > gives more power to anyone. It was just a device to keep track of a > discussion that was already happening, document it in some durable form, > and monitor its status. It's not like that the person with the power of > marking a DEP as "ACCEPTED" has the power of creating the corresponding > consensus.
“Dictator” is probably a bad term. See this as a chairman. Someone who can judge when consensus has been reached, and mark a DEP as accepted. This would avoid the countless and boring nitpicks by people who still want to discuss after the consensus has been reached. > Consensus should exist by itself, ditto for an implementation, and then > the corresponding DEP could be marked ACCEPTED. I don’t buy this. There will always be a large minority, if not a majority, who will refrain from using a DEP until it is marked as accepted. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1326990960.3223.860.camel@pi0307572
