Roger Leigh wrote: > There are 19 packages still using /dev/.udev after udev transitioned > to /run/udev. Unless there are any objections, I'd like to raise the > severity of these bugs from important to serious, given that the /run > migration is a release goal.
If "given that the /run migration is a release goal" were the rationale, I'd object. Am I correct in understanding that these are potentially important or grave bugs because any code relying on /dev/.udev is simply broken with current udev? /dev/.udev doesn't seem to exist. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120112230813.GA20584@burratino
