> On 05/01/2012 18:26, Joachim Breitner wrote: > > So the logical conclusion is to build a binary package from the > > source that contains nothing (or maybe a log of the test results) > > and clearly states in its description that there is no point in > > installing this binary package. > > > > Is this something that we want to allow?
[Jean-Christophe Dubacq] > You could build a binary package that just contains one file (the > test suite log, maybe?). This way, anyone could check that the test > suite was passed by the version of ghc being compiled by installing > the binary package. Yeah, that's pretty much what he already said. What he's asking is whether this is actually a good idea, or whether there are better options. -- Peter Samuelson | org-tld!p12n!peter | http://p12n.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120105232427.ga12...@p12n.org
