Kai Henningsen wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adrian Bridgett) wrote on 27.11.97 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > There are alot of scripts which use unnecessary bashisms. Apart from complex > > scripts most of these can be easily changed to conform to the POSIX shell. > > This has the added advantage of meaning that those who want to can use ash > > as /bin/sh and reap the benefits of improved performance. > > Hmmm ... I remember someone claiming that ash _isn't_ a POSIX shell?
Please install the package and read ash(1), its goal is POSIX compliance. If you can find anything in ash that isn't POSIX, please file a bug report. -- Debian GNU/Linux 1.3 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://greathan.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://greathan.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
