On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 10:42:07AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > > How does the (unreleased) version compare with Arora (my current > > candidate for "small but usable web browser") and how soon is it > > likely to be ready for release? > Arora is just a yet another interface for webkit; it takes over an order of > magnitude more disk space than dillo+fltk, and I guess it has memory usage > in that region as well. > > On the other hand, Dillo's support for CSS and such is sketchy at best. > There's no javascript or anything of that kind as well. What about links2 -g?
-- WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
