On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Peter Samuelson <pe...@p12n.org> wrote: > > [Uoti Urpala] >> IMO letting kFreeBSD block a technology like systemd (or even letting >> it have a significant impact on the discussion about whether it's >> desirable to introduce the technology for the main Linux case) would >> only be justifiable if there were very solid arguments why kFreeBSD >> is a big net win for the project, or after a vote showing significant >> support for the port. > > IMO letting systemd block a technology like kFreeBSD (or even letting > it have a significant impact on the discussion about whether it's > desirable to introduce the port for Debian releases) would > only be justifiable if there were very solid arguments why systemd is > a big net win for the project, or after a vote showing significant > support for the package.
What I don't understand is, why do so many people think they're mutually exclusive? I guess this thread is past the point where nothing useful can come out of it anymore. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/canvyna-myrysmfrzf1hoz9ue_phcbbtfursp_ccbfecbiil...@mail.gmail.com
