On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 04:10:18PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > Hi! > > There are 23 packages in unstable which can't be installed on Debian > GNU/kFreeBSD because of their unconditional dependency on fuse-utils. > On this platform, fuse4bsd should be used instead. > > I indent to file one bug report for each of them: > > wikipediafs sshfs smbnetfs s3ql rofs python-fuse pytagsfs plptools > mythtvfs ntfsprogs libpam-mount libfuse-perl libconfig-model-perl > httpfs2 gphotofs gfarm2fs fusedav fts flickrfs curlftpfs bindfs avfs > aptfs > > using the following template: > > <template> > Package: %package% > Severity: important > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: kfreebsd > > Hi > > This package is not installable on kfreebsd-i386 or kfreebsd-amd64 because it > depends unconditionally on fuse-utils. Please considering adjusting the > dependency from: > > Depends: fuse-utils > > to: > > Depends: fuse-utils [linux-any] | fuse4bsd [kfreebsd-any] > > If it requires fuse-utils specifically because of the command-line > functionality > in that package (and not just to obtain a FUSE daemon), please reply to this > bug report so we can try to find a solution.
IIRC, that's actually a requirement of libfuse itself, not directly from the packages using libfuse. So why shouldn't that be libfuse's job to depend on these? For the very few rdeps that *don't* rely on the API that uses them? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110716144340.ga13...@glandium.org
