Hi, Am Sonntag, den 29.05.2011, 11:26 +0200 schrieb Josselin Mouette: > > But it still happens that those patches are generated[1] when the maintainer > > did not expect any change at all. That's why we added the option > > --abort-on-upstream-changes for maintainers who never wants dpkg-source > > to auto-create a patch. > > > > I wonder if I should not make this option the default > > Yes please.
I’m ok with it, as long as the unexpected changes are put in a patch file, either in /tmp or some location cleaned by dpkg-buildpackage, so if I want the change I can just move it into debian/patches with an appropriate name. Basically avoiding yet another call to dpkg-buildpackage (--record-changes or something) just to get the patch in place. I often run dpkg-buildpackage -S just with the intention of recording my changes as a patch, as that is more convenient to run "quilt new ...; quilt add ..." _before_ doing the changes. BTW, for all who create patches this way and want to later split the patch into two logically independent patches, I am creating an interactive patch splitter based on the darcs UI (but only the UI, don’t worry): http://www.joachim-breitner.de/blog/archives/425-ipatch,-the-interactive-patch-editor.html (Packaging for Debian is pending, but of course a goal. Until then, cabal-install will get it to your computer almost as easy as apt-get install.) Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
