Hi Laszlo, On 11-05-24 at 07:08pm, Laszlo Papp wrote: > I have tried to use the debian/rules that you can see below. My > concern is that I would like to make a test package (for maemo, but > actually should also work for debian) in case of using upstart for > init functionalities. > The problem is that if I try to use a debian/cups.upstart file for > that purpose, it seems to be hard coded. It installs the upstart job > into the /etc/init/ and I cannot customize that path, for instance to > /etc/init/apps/ as I would like to have it. I tried to set the > "--onlyscripts" option in order to hope that it does not generate any > init script/job inside the package and I could just make a workaround > by using postinst. > > Other option is to change the whole packaging to "dh" usage. However > if I could just bypass the systemv init script and/or hard coded > upstart job installation, it would be easier for me because I am not a > packager. =)
Not quite sure what is the central issue of yours here. CDBS is *not* a tool for beginners to do packaging blind-folded! I believe (and hope) same is true for short-form dh. CDBS use (long-form) debhelper tools. If you experience a sensible use-case impossible or awkward to express using CDBS, then please do contact us at the [CDBS mailinglist] or file a bugreport against it. [CDBS mailinglist]: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/build-common-hackers If you know what you are doing but believe there is an issue more enerally with how Debian (and debhelper and CDBS) deals with upstart, then please isolate the problematic long-form debhelper command instead of convoluting in some more specific packaging style. If you need help packaging in general, then perhaps debian-users or debian-mentors are more appropriate than this list. Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
