Roger Leigh <rle...@codelibre.net> wrote: > On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 02:29:39PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] >> Also libgcrypt does not seem to be designed to be used indirectly (via >> gnutls) without knowing and caring about it. (Threading, secmem). >> Which is why about 50% of all gnutls-using packages are using >> gcry_control.
> This is the root cause, I think. libgcrypt was developed as part of > gnutls, and although it's a separate library, it's insufficiently > generalised. It's implicitly doing things the way gnutls wanted them > doing, [...] I am not sure, but afaik the primary target for libgcrypt was gnupg(2). gnutls happened later. libgcrypt is not developed as part of gnutls, there are different upstream authors. cu andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ju3098-hem....@argenau.downhill.at.eu.org
