On 2011-04-10 11:56, David Paleino wrote: > I think the time spent was the major objection, so I stripped it down to... > > $ time ./update-bash-completion > bash-completion: updating completion symlinks... done. > > real 0m0.225s > user 0m0.148s > sys 0m0.020s > $
Very good! > Now, with that time spent, I suppose the objections against triggers would be > fewer and less important. Am I wrong? :) > I must say I'm a bit uncomfortable with APT-hooks, since the update script > would then be run even for packages with no executable at all (lib*, python-*, > and so on). So, I still prefer a file-trigger. Sure, using APT hooks is a hack (like Goswin said already). From the time output above, I see it's now much faster than the man-db trigger? If so, I would say go ahead with file triggers. -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110410101137.GA21569@r500-debian
