On 2011-04-06 codeh...@debian.org wrote:
> Package: ggz-grubby
> Severity: normal
> User: codeh...@debian.org
> Usertags: la-file-removal

> To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy
> 10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs
> against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed
> or stripped of the dependency_libs variable.
[...]

Hello,

Please stop this mass bug filing. 
a) There were duplicate bugs filed.
b) Bugs were filed for issues recently solved.
c) The bugs reports are unversioned.

I can completely understand that a and b can occassionally happen due
to timing issues. However imnsho a MBF with unversioned bug-reports is
not acceptable.

cu and- closing three invalid reports in ggz-* -dreas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110407171343.gb2...@downhill.g.la

Reply via email to