"Adam D. Barratt" <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote: >On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 12:12 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> On Monday, April 04, 2011 12:05:09 PM Neil McGovern wrote: >> > I also note a lack of replies to feedb...@release.debian.org - >these >> > mails are definately useful, but I really would appreciate any >comments >> > going there, so I don't have to spend days trawling archives to >pick up >> > people's points. >> >> That seems like an odd reply to a message in a thread you started on >debian- >> devel? > >Unless you're counting the d-d-a mail, Neil didn't start the thread; in >fact, as far as I can see, it's his first post to it - the "time based >freezes" thread in reply to the d-d-a mail was started by Zack. > >fwiw, the d-d-a mail said: > >> The beginning of a release cycle seems the ideal time for that >> discussion and we hope to be in a position to start it after >processing >> the results of the retrospective. > Debian-devel seems like a reasonable place to be discussing how Debian development should be structured.
Yes, that is the message to which I referred. It seems equally reasonable to me for follow-up discussion of a message to debian-devel-announce would occur on debian-devel, particularly when the message doesn't specify an alternate venue. So I still find that on odd reply to the thread. It doesn't seem particularly consistent with the improved communication I've heard the release team is doing these days. Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/28670ab5-28a8-4211-9b69-abcfbbdd8...@email.android.com
