On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Michael Tautschnig wrote: > > # package quality > > Advocate: Holger Levsen and Luk Claes > > State: confirmed > > Wiki: http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/PackagesQuality > > This is a never ending goal of sustaining our packages quality by > > improving our tests and following up closely... so needless to say that > > I would still advocate this one. > I would advocate the idea behind this goal as well, yet I think as-is this > isn't > a very useful goal: how would we ever measure its achievement? To this end, I
guarantee build-time run of unittests if such are provided by upstream. in my experience those were really helpful, especially for exotic architectures. side-question: what to do about source packages shipping only binary packages of arch 'all' (thus not rebuilt by the farm) while still susceptible to architectures specificity. -- =------------------------------------------------------------------= Keep in touch www.onerussian.com Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110330233503.gh6...@onerussian.com
