On Mon, 07 Mar 2011, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > While a review on -devel (and in general sharing news about his plans) is > > always welcome, I really don't see the point of bringing this up as if it > > was a big violation of a rule. > > Never said it's a 'big violation'. The fact is: we have a rule, we > pointed out many times (in particular to new contributors to Debian) > that filing many bugs without consulting d-devel is bad, so I'd like > to know if there's a reason this rule was not followed in this case. > Is this wrong?
The point of this rule is to avoid useless MBF, and/or MBF for changes that are not agreed upon. Do you have any such concern? Otherwise you're just losing our time in useless discussions of administrative rules. Cheers, PS: Yes this is all tainted by your regular attacks of Matthias. Would someone else have asked the very same question, it could have been interpreted differently. -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English) ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110307085435.ga...@rivendell.home.ouaza.com
