[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Sorry, this came out sounding harsher than it was supposed to. I just > think that there are some problems that could really do with solving, > and Reply-To: would do it at a relatively small cost.
Is it really so hard to use ``Reply All'' and then cut out all the Cc: except the list address ? Are there mailers that are feeble enough to make this difficult ? Or is it just that people are not using the functionality available to them ? IMHO overriding an existing Reply-To is a bad idea. With your solution, how do you propose to deal with the case where someone has a good reason for using a Reply-To ? Cheers, Phil. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Sorry, this came out sounding harsher than it was supposed to. I just > think that there are some problems that could really do with solving, > and Reply-To: would do it at a relatively small cost. -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
