On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 08:21:25PM +0000, Hector Oron wrote: > I do really apologize in case we have miss something, we'll try to do > better next time.
Thanks for this followup Hector. FWIW, no one said those NMUs were not welcome and it's in fact nice to see you're pushing for armhf. Julien's (very valid!) points were on two specific aspects: the lack of NMU notifications to the bug logs and the lack of nmudiffs. Please ensure you fix those, possibly starting from the NMUs which are already in DELAYED. For the random lurkers: current NMU guidelines are quite liberal in the usage of the DELAYED queue, but require that the NMU-ed maintainer, as well as other bug lurkers, are put in the best possible position to catch up with the NMU-ed work. Everyone following: http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu won't have any problem with NMUs. /me, still campaigning for NMUs as the best device we have to fight inertia. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ Quando anche i santi ti voltano le spalle, | . |. I've fans everywhere ti resta John Fante -- V. Capossela .......| ..: |.......... -- C. Adams
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
