On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:59:46PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le vendredi 18 février 2011 à 10:29 +0100, Benjamin Drung a écrit : > > I favor a combination of idea one and two, which is: Keep 3.5 in > > unstable and push the last 4.0 betas/rc to experimental. Push 4.0 to > > unstable when it's out. > > > > Then we have one big break and a tested 4.0 in unstable. > > I’d favor that one too. The sooner we can adapt reverse dependencies to > 4.0 in experimental, the better. And no need to do the work twice.
There have been almost a year to adapt reverse dependencies to 3.6 in experimental. And I don't think most rdeps are ready for 3.6. Do you expect things to be significantly different? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110218123427.gb22...@glandium.org
