Samuel Thibault, le Sun 13 Feb 2011 19:51:07 +0100, a écrit : > Michael Goetze, le Sun 13 Feb 2011 19:21:32 +0100, a écrit : > > On 02/07/2011 12:10 AM, Svante Signell wrote: > > >On 2011-02-03, Joerg Jaspert<jo...@ganneff.de> wrote: > > >>* get rid of hurd (or discuss this) > > > > > >Why? GNU/Hurd has made vast improvements during last year. Even the > > >Debian installer is functional. Now, with support for VMs like qemu, xen > > >and virtualbox, more people are showing interest in GNU/Hurd. > > > > I note that for January 2011, hurd.git had 4 commits, adding 17 lines > > and removing 7. This seems representative of recent months, and activity > > levels on gnumach.git are similar.
Also, you should check git log a bit more. Yes, I haven't had much time to spend on the Hurd lately, focusing on the Squeeze release rather than on the hurd-i386 port. Check out the log around this summer. > > How exactly do you make "vast improvements" at this rate? It must be > > very high-level code... > > It's not improvements in the hurd codebase, but other packages, like the > debian installer. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110213190136.gk6...@const.famille.thibault.fr
