On Wed, 3 Dec 1997, Oleg Krivosheev wrote: > > libg++ is not supported right now and is obscolecent. > > it's a bit misleading. It's not integrated into > tarball, but it's quite good piece of C++ codeand > can be compiled by EGCS. HJ has it packed separately > somewhere
Ah, well any code that uses it is non-standard so I would strongly discourage anyone from using it for a new project. The STL classes provide pretty much the same functionality in a standard way. Could we possible separate libg++ and libstdc++? I don't think there is much reason to include libg++ in Base, but libstdc++ definately should be in there. I do admit I don't have any idea how much C++ code in debian makes use of the special G++ constructs so this might be a bad idea! Jason -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
