On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > Alternatively, version of dpkg could be lowered and functionality > conditioned on the version of dpkg (thus implementing necessary logic to > support older versions), it would imho be better and more flexible to > please those backport-lovers, saving them and you time going > patching/branching things around.
No. When we backport something, we are perfectly capable of backporting dpkg-dev first. Crap happens when you need backported debhelper, should whomever did that backport have neglected to _change_ debhelper to do whatever is really needed in the older distro. This is not the sort of problem that backported dpkg-dev would ever cause. Most of the time, all we backport-lovers really need is complete (and properly versioned) build dependencies. It _does_ help if you stick to debhelper and ucf functionality available on stable for packages that are extremely likely to be backported, though. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110124162454.ge6...@khazad-dum.debian.net
