Le lundi 27 décembre 2010 à 22:12 +0100, Holger Levsen a écrit : > But given the serious answers he also gave (and the retitle-joke itself) I > dont think this humor was abuse. It was a joke, which some people didnt like > and some didnt find funny. And some laughed. So what.
It wasn’t really meant as a joke, more as a camel’s back breaking with this last straw. These metapackages are a continuous source of grievance and bug reports. I can receive the same day reports from people saying the metapackages are too heavy and others asking new dependencies to be added. There’s no end to that madness. > Personally (and in the piuparts context) I used to be way more relaxed + > cheerful replying to people who tell me that (they think) their package had > valid reasons to violate policy - but sadly over time I've become midly > annoyed and also bored, that I have to spend my time again+again to explain > why/that policy is there and also applies to this or that package... I can only empathize with you. -- .''`. : :' : “You would need to ask a lawyer if you don't know `. `' that a handshake of course makes a valid contract.” `- -- J???rg Schilling -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1293527797.14833.17.ca...@meh
