On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 10:56:23AM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > After years and years of waiting for packages to register their > documents with doc-base, and filing individual bugs with some (not all > -- I am not jidani, LOL) of those that didn't register, I am quite > frustrated:
> [41]matica:doc$ pwd > /usr/share/doc > [42]matica:doc$ find -L . -name "*.html" -o -name "*.htm" \ > -o -name "*.pdf" -o -name "*.pdf.gz" | cut -d/ -f2 | sort | uniq | wc -l > 273 > [43]matica:doc$ find -L . -name "*.html" -o -name "*.htm" \ > -o -name "*.pdf" -o -name "*.pdf.gz" | cut -d/ -f2 | sort |\ > uniq | while read p ; do if ! [ -e "/usr/share/doc-base/$p" ] ;\ > then echo "$p" ; fi ; done | wc -l > 203 > So, out of 273 doc-containing packages on this system, just 70 bothered. > I feel a strong urge to put the commands in a script that will auto-file > a bug against any package in the output of the last command. How do > maintainers feel about that? This should only be a mass bug filing if you're going to provide patches for each of the affected packages. Filing bugs telling maintainers to draft doc-base install files is about as useful as filing bugs telling maintainers to write manpages. Actually, it's significantly less useful - most developers use manpages, but I can't remember the last time I used the doc-base infrastructure to browse documentation. Contrary to the concerns expressed up-list, my understanding is that doc-base does integrate with scrollkeeper, which means the docs are available under both GNOME and KDE desktop help interfaces; but on non-desktop systems, I don't think we install a doc-base browser by default, and I have never seen a text-mode browser for doc-base documentation that I found worth using because browsing to /usr/share/doc/$package is always quicker. Unless you find a way to make doc-base compelling enough that developers will actually dogfood it when they want documentation, I think package coverage here is always going to be rather poor. (Also, I just tried to use yelp on Ubuntu 10.04 to test out the user experience of looking for documentation provided by doc-base... Despite having rarian-compat and doc-base properly installed, and despite doc-base being an unmodified Debian package, *none* of the doc-base documentation appears to turn up when I search. Assuming this isn't an Ubuntu-specific bug, I think it needs to be fixed before you can expect much maintainer interest in providing new doc-base files. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100808054951.gk23...@dario.dodds.net