On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 10:44 +0200, Jesús M. Navarro wrote: > Hi, Manoj: > > On Thursday 22 July 2010 07:17:15 Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 21 2010, Will wrote: > > > Also I imagine that it helps that they have some kind of commercial > > > support behind their projects, whereas Debian has little/none of that. > > > > One of the issues I have faced in trying to get Debian > > introduced in big companies is the percieved lack of a coherent > > copyright; and company lawyers being uncomfortable with the concept > > that most licesnse pass the dfsg, but we can't guarantee that, please > > go read several thoudand individual license docs to figure out what you > > are getting. > > That's again about perception. Debian has exactly the same copyright > coherence (or lack of it) than SUSE, Red Hat, Ubuntu or even proprietary > Unices.
I would say we are even more careful about licence issues than the commercial distributions. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
