On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 12:28:26PM +0100, Darren Salt wrote: > I demand that Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton may or may not have written... > > [snip] > > basically, an interpretation of the decision from the mozilla foundation is > > that all languages but javascript can get lost. i do not understand why, > > after years of support thanks to xpcom, _just_ when there's a project which > > actually _uses_ alternative language bindings 100% and i meaaan 100%, the > > mozilla foundation slams the door in its face and in the face of every > > other project using xpcom. > > I'm wondering whether I should start investigating alternative Javascript > libraries, given Mozilla's (apparent) reluctance to install libmozjs as > anything other than a private library for use by xulrunner-using apps. > > That said, if anybody is prepared to take the Ubuntu workaround for this in > their gxine package and make that suitable for upstream, I'll take that > instead. I did try to push for something which is acceptable for upstream, > but no, distribution-specific workaround... > > (I suppose that I could create a Ubuntu-based chroot, but I'd rather avoid > that.)
The XPCOM problems mentionned above have nothing to do with the libmozjs API. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100716093927.gd3...@glandium.org
