Hello everyone,
Goswin von Brederlow (I think he is an apt maintainer)
suggested to forward this wishlist bug report to debian-devel.
Best regards,
Alexandre Fournier
----- Message Transféré -----
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:44:23 +0200
De: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-...@web.de>
À: Alexandre Fournier <bru...@free.fr>
Cc: 587...@bugs.debian.org
Sujet: Re: Bug#587620: apt: add an optionnal "Why" field to "suggest"
entries (in the dependency field)
Alexandre Fournier <bru...@free.fr> writes:
> Package: apt
> Version: 0.7.25.3
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hello,
>
> Sometimes, from a user point of view, understanding why a package A
> recommends or suggests package B1 or B2 is not straightforward.
>
> It would be nice to add an optionnal "why" field to explain what
> features are enabled in package A when installing package B1.
>
> Ideally, this could be displayed when the user calls : apt-cache show
> or looks at the package data in another front-end for apt. This way,
> they would know from the start if they want to install package B1 all
> along, when installing A.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Alexandre Fournier
Imho that is not something that affects apt.
First you should make a proposal to introduce the WHY field in packages
and get them to adopt it. Probably best to write to debian-devel and
build a consensus. This can be done first as custom field even
without needing to patch dpkg for a new field. The field would
automatically be shown by apt-cache too. So you are already most of the
way there.
Only once the WHY field is in use in a large number of apckages
front-ends could be changed to support it. But that would be a bug for
aptitude, adept, cupts, ... rather than apt itself.
MfG
Goswin
--
Alexandre Fournier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100701104520.730c1...@afournier.xerus.net
