Raphael Geissert <geiss...@debian.org> writes: > Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I think it's moderately unlikely that we're going to manage to keep dash >> from being treated as essential even if we say that it's only essential >> for the /bin/sh functionality. > Based on [1], [2] and [3], there's no single package that ships a /bin/dash > script but doesn't depend on dash. If we exclude dash from the *depends-on- > essential-* checks I don't think it will be too difficult to preserve the > current status. Okay, let's just do that, then, and see how it goes. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87lja1cbns....@windlord.stanford.edu
