David Paleino <da...@debian.org> writes:
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:00:28 +0200, David Paleino wrote:
>
>> Hello people,
>> [..]
>
> Ahah! I got it.
>
>> [..]
>> $ ls -1 *.gz
>> josm_0.0.svn3329.orig-plugins-0.0.svn21666.tar.gz
>> josm_0.0.svn3329.orig.tar.gz
>> $
>
> <component> doesn't accept dots. So, I changed that to *-plugins-svn21666, but
> it obviously unpacked it into josm/plugins-svn21666/. While this could be an
> acceptable solution (but would need some overhead to refresh the patches at
> each release, and to commit useless changes to $VCS), I don't really fancy it.
>
> Only using "*-plugins.tar.gz" works fine :)
>
> /me beats himself hard.
That is because components are not supposed to have versions of their
own. :) If components are seperately versioned and releases then build
them seperate.
Is it really so much more work to have 2 source packages? Seems to me
that would make it much simpler to test a new svn checkout of just the
plugins for example.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87wrtpbxgg....@frosties.localdomain
