On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 03:10:15AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On May 07, Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> wrote:
> > > - a decision to drop kfreebsd as a release architecture > > Since 1 and 2 aren't happening, I think we should consider going with > > the third option. > Me too, I believe that the people interested in kfreebsd-* have had more > than enough time to provide the compatibility framework and we cannot > hold back Debian forever for the benefit of a toy port. Was this request ever actually made to the kfreebsd porters? I'm not sure that it was, in which case it's rather unfair to say that they've had enough time when they were never informed this was a pressing issue. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
