On 30 March 2010 16:46, Sven Mueller <deb...@incase.de> wrote:
> My main reason for not yet switching is that hg-buildpackage and
> svn-buildpackage don't completely support the 3.0 format yet as far as I
> can tell.
You can try out mercurial-buildpackage, where I have tried to support
"3.0 (quilt)" as good as I could: the default branch contains the
fully patched source code as well as the explicit debian/patches.
That way you can just hack away anywhere in your package and
repeatedly run mercurial-buildpackage until you are satisfied, and
then finally rename the dpkg-source autogenerated patch to something
meaningful. But I would like to hear suggestions for improvements...
Ohh, and thanks to Raphael Hertzog for doing all the hard work on the
new formats!
Cheers,
--
Jens Peter Secher.
_DD6A 05B0 174E BFB2 D4D9 B52E 0EE5 978A FE63 E8A1 jpsecher gmail com_.
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion.
Q. Why is top posting bad?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/x2wc4f47b5b1003311704w73e6efafha33f5ecfd4d88...@mail.gmail.com
