On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:37:59PM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > Hi! > > Neil Williams schrieb: > > >Wouldn't a simpler method be to identify uploads that inadvertently > >impair an ongoing transition and bump that one upload to experimental > >or simply tell the DD not to upload to unstable? > [..] > >Maybe extending dput functionality to check a file on a central server > >that lists the ongoing transitions and blocking the upload in the first > >place? > > Maybe I'm wrong but I thought the release team already has the > possibility to block uploads because of transitions? I assumed the > problem was to identify the packages involved in a transition...
Right, but those blocks are for specific packages. What we could possibly need (at least at this point in the release cycle) would be a general safety-guard to keep people from (maybe unknowingly) uploading new transitions to unstable. Raphael's list might help here, if implemented. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100327224504.gh5...@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org
