Hello, I am currently preparing a Debian port to the "e500" architecture for my employer eXMeritus, a subdivision of Boeing. The "e500" architecture is an architecturally-incompatible variant of PowerPC sponsored by IBM and FreeScale, used in several of FreeScale's high-end embedded networking processors (also known as MPC85xx). The Debian bugreport below indicates that there's at least one other developer currently trying to use Debian on e500-based systems: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=568123 http://download.breakpoint.cc/debian/linutronix-lenny-gnuspe/
We are building some very high-end specialty embedded hardware using these processors, although there are a number of affordable development boards available for others interested in the CPUs. The specific GNU triplet for this architecture is "powerpc-linux-gnuspe". Like the ARM EABI port (arm-linux-gnueabi) the naming seems unfortunate here; an architecture triplet such as "powerpcspe-linux-gnu" or "e500-linux-gnu" would have been far more appropriate. At this time I'm not sure if there would be any interest in this port from the rest of the community, as the e500 is a relatively obscure architecture. On the other hand, as the port uses almost exactly the same codebase as the "powerpc" architecture incidental package breakage should be unlikely. Regardless, we certainly plan to submit the few e500-relevant patches (just eglibc and gcc at present) and make a general buildd and archive available within a month or so. For our specific embedded system, we will also be publishing additional sets of patched-and-hardened Debian packages as we move closer to an actual final release. So my questions for the community: * Are there any immediate recommendations or cautions regarding a new architecture port? * Where can I find the latest-and-greatest Debian buildd and archive software? There seems to be one version in the archives and several others running around on the internet. As far as I can tell the 3 I have tried have all been miserably buggy and/or undocumented. Internally we are using the python-based "rebuildd" as a build server and "reprepro" for repository hosting right now; they seem to work moderately well after some fiddling. * Are there any ready-made configurations available for using "icecc" or "distcc" to distribute load from an embedded Debian buildd/rebuildd to several amd64 build servers with cross-compilers? * Is there potentially general interest in an e500 port? My employer might be able to provide long-term buildd and porter systems; unfortunately we would probably need to maintain physical ownership and control over the computers themselves. * Regarding software security updates, I am aware that most vendors of OS distributions participate in coordinated-disclosure and embargo agreements in order to receive advance notice of certain vulnerabilities. My employer is currently considering what we would need to do in order to get access to those notifications; on the other hand we would much rather participate directly in the Debian security release process. Would it be possible for us as a third-party corporation to be a part of that process? * Even if an e500 port does not go upstream, would it be possible to get the appropriate entries added to the upstream dpkg cpu and triplet tables? We're using a simple 10-line patch to dpkg locally, hopefully that would be acceptable? Your advice, comments, and criticism are highly appreciated! Cheers, Kyle Moffett -- Kyle Moffett kyle.d.moff...@boeing.com eXMeritus Software Integrated Intelligence The Boeing Company http://www.exmeritus.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/c7ce5272.7f63%kyle.d.moff...@boeing.com
