On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Michal ?iha? wrote: > Hi > > Dne Thu, 4 Mar 2010 16:46:11 +0100 (CET) > Santiago Vila <sanv...@unex.es> napsal(a): > > > Sorry for not following developers-reference to the letter. > > > > I asked in debian-release, and I got the okay from one of the release > > managers to report the bugs. > > Okay, in this case it would be helpful to include link to this in the > bug report, because the bug report really does not contain much > information why it should be done and why it is important: > > http://bugs.debian.org/572481 > http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/02/msg00298.html
Agreed, and sorry for not having included such information. I'll try to do that if I have to send more reports for a missing package. Those who have read the previous README.Debian in gettext, however, will understand easily why this is being done. > Also there are probably some packages missing from your bug reports, > because geeqie also build-depends on cvs and it did not get the bug It's ok that geeqie did not receive a report. Not all packages having "build-depends: cvs" are involved. Bug reports have been sent only to those of them who actually used autopoint during a test build. There might be missing reports if the package build-depends on cvs in an indirect way, i.e. package A build-depends on B and package B depends (directly or indirectly) on cvs. If anybody knows of a case like that, I would be interested. Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/alpine.deb.1.10.1003042030420.28...@kolmogorov.unex.es
