Luk Claes <l...@debian.org> writes: > There is currently discussion ongoing about how to move forward, > though due to the complex nature of the current situation (where also > lots of FUD etc is on the lists), it is being dealt in private.
Nearly three months later, the issue remains: Python in Debian does not have a maintainer who communicates in a timely manner on the ‘debian-python’ forum. (This is evidenced by another ongoing discussion about problems with the python2.6 transition, with no input from the maintainer.) What is the specific plan to resolve that issue of maintainership, and what has the past three months of private action achieved for its resolution? -- \ “Never express yourself more clearly than you are able to | `\ think.” —Niels Bohr | _o__) | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87ocj8zwjq....@benfinney.id.au