On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 02:57:45PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 13/02/10 at 21:09 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 08:46:31PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > But we are constantly wondering where we should go from there. Should we > > > add more data (like the RC bugs in stable and the unfixed security > > > issues)? Or should we instead try to decrease the amount of data (to > > > increase the signal/noise ratio), for example by not reporting about > > > Lintian errors and warnings? > > > > One thing that would be nice, but that is not directly related to DDPO > > messages or the PTS, though it's always when i receive the DDPO mail > > that i think about it, would be to allow upstream version tracking of > > branches. > > > > For example, right now, for iceweasel, version 3.6 is reported as the > > last version, which is nice, but i'd also like to be able to get a > > report when 3.5.8 is going to be released, though i'd also like to keep > > the current tracking for the 3.6 versions. > > Isn't that just a problem of writing your debian/watch in a way that > picks up 3.5.8 but not 3.6.X?
Partially, since DDPO won't then follow 3.6 as well. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100214141414.ga9...@glandium.org
